Efficiency-Adjusted Public Capital and Growth

Posted by Sanjeev Gupta and Alvar Kangur

Working paper logo
“... less-accountable poor-country governments are likely to be disproportionately less efficient (relative to the private sector) than rich country ones. Hence, there are good reasons to expect the government to play an especially detrimental role in the productivity of investment in poor countries.” - Francesco Caselli (2005)

Not all public investment spending in developing countries translates into productive capital assets (Pritchett (2000)). This is due in part to weak investment processes, including the lack of transparent and open competition for award of contracts, ineffectiveness of internal audit and the absence of medium-term budget frameworks. A recent study by Gupta and others (2011) takes these weaknesses into account in constructing an “efficiency-adjusted” public capital series for 52 low- and middle-income countries during 1960-2008.

Efficiency is proxied by the Public Investment Management Index (PIMI) constructed by Dabla-Norris and others (2011). PIMI—composed of 17 sub-indexes—evaluates countries on the basis of four stages of public investment management process: project appraisal, selection, implementation and evaluation. The results show that there is a significant gap between the adjusted and unadjusted public capital stocks. This holds true for both low- and middle-income countries.

Quantitative analysis shows that:

Wp charts
Note: The posts on the IMF PFM Blog should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy.

Recent