The book is organized around four main themes:
- Public investment and fiscal policy issues in Europe. The first part of the book discusses the important links between achieving fiscal and macroeconomic sustainability and selecting and implementing priority public investment projects. It looks in particular at the relationship between public investment and economic growth, recent trends in public investment spending in Europe, and options for improving the budgeting process and enhancing the efficiency of investment spending.
- Fiscal risks from PPPs. The second part of the book focuses on PPPs, the advantages they can bring about to realize public investment, the fiscal risks they can entail, salient features of an efficient institutional framework to manage these risks, and different country experiences.
- Institutional environment for PPPs. The third part of the book elaborates on specific aspects of a PPP framework, such as good principles for private sector participation in infrastructure, alternative legal regimes, and potential financing arrangements.
- PPP accounting, reporting, and auditing. The last part of the book looks into issues prompted by the lack of internationally accepted standards for PPP accounting and reporting. It also lays out best standards to ensure that the fiscal implications of PPPs are adequately assessed and transparently disclosed, so that governments can better manage fiscal risks from PPPs. Finally, it describes failures and successes of PPP projects in selected countries, based on auditors’ perspectives.
Important common principles run throughout the book. First, considerable public investment is needed in all EU member states, but particularly in the new member states. Second, the impact of public investment on economic growth depends crucially on the quantity and quality of the initial capital stock, the quality of the investment project itself, and macroeconomic and fiscal sustainability considerations. Third, PPPs can be a valid alternative to traditional public procurement if they offer value for money. PPPs should not, however, be used to circumvent budgetary spending limits by pushing investment off budget. Also, PPPs do not alleviate the government’s intertemporal budget constraint, except to the extent that they facilitate the mobilization of resources through user fees and promote efficiency gains. The latter have to be large enough to compensate for the typically higher borrowing costs of private sector partners and the higher transaction costs involved in complex PPP contracts. Fourth, appropriate risk sharing is crucial for promoting efficiency gains and ensuring value for money. Governments should thus resist the temptation to tailor risk sharing agreements so as to shift PPPs off balance sheet, as this would lead to inappropriate contract design, increase renegotiation incidence, and reduce benefits from PPPs.
A strong enabling legal and institutional environment is needed to handle the complexities of PPPs. This entails several important elements. For instance, there has to be adequate and multidisciplinary capacity in the public sector to assess PPP projects, manage the tendering process, and accompany the implementation phase. Also, there has to be a dedicated institutional structure in place to deal with PPPs, including an appropriate gateway process managed by the ministry of finance that grants the finance minister veto power at different stages of the PPP cycle. Finally, fiscal costs and risks have to be assessed. They have to be transparently disclosed in budget documentation and fully taken into consideration in fiscal and debt sustainability assessments.
Posted by Gerd Schwartz, Ana Corbacho, and Katja Funke (all IMF staff)
