PFM Reform in Tropical Paradise – A Case Study of Dominica

Posted by Mark Silins

Where is Dominica?

The Republic of Dominica is a small island economy located in the Eastern Caribbean. It has a population approaching 80,000 people.

Background

In 2010 Dominica undertook its second PEFA exercise. Following on from completing the assessment, the authorities, with the support of the Caribbean Regional Technical Assistance Centre (CARTAC), developed a Public Financial Management Reform Action Plan to prioritise its reform agenda, and to assist in the coordination of support with development partners.

In fact, 15 countries in the Caribbean have undertaken a PEFA (a number twice) and most have also developed a PFM reform action plan.

Dominica stands apart because it has taken ownership of the reforms to the next level. On completing the plan the Financial Secretary wrote to Development Partners seeking their support in implementing the plan. The FS has also regularly reviewed progress against the plan.

What has Dominica Achieved?

In the last 18 months, Dominica has progressed its reform agenda in a number of key areas including:

Many of these initiatives are ongoing. Notwithstanding this, it has been a significant achievement in undertaking reform for such a small economy in a relatively short timeframe. While technical assistance has been a contributing factor, the level of support has not been substantial and the credit must largely be attributed to the commitment and ownership shown by senior officials in the government.

It is particularly worth noting the efforts of the Accountant General’s Department, where much of the reform initiatives have been focused. The Accountant General along with her management team, have led the processes, ensuring staff engagement and understanding throughout. This ambitious programme has created some waves, and has its critics, but to the credit of the team, they have continued to implement the changes despite the detractors.

Note: The posts on the IMF PFM Blog should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy.

Recent